Revise and substitute words with alternate synonyms while altering the sentence arrangement.
JD Vance, the Republican running for vice president, upheld his previous remarks on women, childless families, and the Trump campaign’s plans to expel undocumented immigrants in a comprehensive conversation with “This Week” co-host Jonathan Karl, set to air in full on Sunday morning.
In light of the narrowing race due to Vice President Kamala Harris leading the Democratic ticket, the Ohio senator stressed that he and Trump are “highly confident” in their election prospects.
“I believe we will emerge victorious. I also believe that we must exert maximum effort for the remainder of the election to sway American voters in our favor,” Vance expressed to Karl. “That’s the crux of the matter.”
Vance expands on ‘pro-family’ perspectives
The senator has faced criticism for his repeated statements regarding individuals without children, including remarks made during an interview in July 2021 with then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson where Vance labeled prominent Democrats like Harris as “childless cat ladies.”
In a speech to a conservative audience at the Intercollegiate Studies Institute prior to that interview, Vance also proposed that parents with children should receive additional voting privileges.
“While the Democrats are considering granting voting rights to 16-year-olds, I propose a different approach,” Vance stated in his speech. “Let’s allocate votes to all children in the country, but let’s entrust the control of those votes to the parents of those children. When you, as a parent, cast your ballot in this nation, you should wield greater influence.”
Vance clarified to Karl that his concept was a “theoretical exercise” in response to Democratic suggestions for younger voters, rather than a policy position.
MORE: Vance responds to ‘childless cat ladies’ backlash, claims Democrats are ‘anti-family’
“Do I rue my words? I regret how the media and the Kamala Harris campaign have, frankly, twisted my statements,” he stated. “They have misrepresented what I said as a policy proposal that I never advocated for. … I simply expressed a desire for a more pro-family approach, and that remains my stance.”
In the discussion with ABC News, Vance concurred with Trump’s perspective.
“People are casting their votes for Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, not for JD or Tim Walz,” he remarked. “I also believe that he’s correct in stating that the politics of this issue are not extremely significant.”
Nonetheless, Vance emphasized that he is “absolutely” certain that Trump is self-assured in his ability to assume the role of commander in chief if necessary.
“What I infer from his actions, as he made it the central focus of his vetting process, is, ‘Do I believe this individual is capable of assuming the presidency on day one if, God forbid, an emergency occurs? Absolutely,'” Vance expressed.
Vance repeats inaccurate statements about Tim Walz’s policies
At a rally in Montana on Friday evening, Trump propagated falsehoods about Democratic vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz’s policies regarding transgender youth, alleging that the Minnesota governor endorsed “a law enabling the state to take children to alter their gender.”
Walz has signed laws aimed at safeguarding the rights of transgender individuals to receive gender-affirming care, which includes gender-affirming surgeries as well as services like therapy and non-surgical medical procedures such as hormone therapy and puberty suppressants. The law does not permit what Trump asserted.
Vance mentioned that he did not watch the late-night rally completely but reiterated some of those false claims in the conversation with Karl, stating that Walz “backed taking children from their parents if the parents do not approve of gender reassignment.”
He referenced Walz’s recent statement at a rally accusing Republicans of not “minding their own business.”
Revise and substitute vocabulary with alternative synonyms while altering the structure of the sentence.
- Amit Rohidas Speaks Out About Red-Card Controversy in Paris Olympics Quarter-Final Game
- Rewrite the sentence by replacing words with synonyms and changing the structure:
Original: The book was very interesting and kept me engaged until the end.
Rewritten: The novel was incredibly captivating and held my attention throughout.