Hathras case: SC to deliver verdict on Tuesday on pleas seeking court-monitored probe | India News – Times of India


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court is scheduled to pronounce its judgment on Tuesday on a batch of pleas which have sought a court-monitored probe into the Hathras case, by which a Dalit woman was allegedly brutally raped and died of accidents, and switch of trial to Delhi.
A bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde, Justice A S Bopanna and Justice V Ramasubramanian had on October 15 reserved its verdict on a public curiosity litigation (PIL) and several other intervention pleas of activists and attorneys who’ve argued {that a} honest trial was not doable in Uttar Pradesh because the probe has allegedly been botched up.
The lawyer, showing for the sufferer’s household, had advised the apex court docket that trial within the case be shifted out of Uttar Pradesh to a court docket within the nationwide capital after completion of investigation.
A 19-yr-previous Dalit girl was allegedly raped by 4 higher-caste males in Hathras on September 14. She died on September 29 at Delhi’s Safdarjung Hospital throughout remedy.
The sufferer was cremated within the lifeless of the night time close to her dwelling on September 30. Her household alleged they have been pressured by the native police to hurriedly conduct her final rites. Local cops, nevertheless, mentioned the cremation was carried out “as per the wishes of the family”
During the listening to within the apex court docket, activist-lawyer Indira Jaising had additionally raised apprehension of not having a good trial within the case in Uttar Pradesh.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had referred to the affidavit filed within the apex court docket by the Uttar Pradesh authorities which gave particulars concerning the safety and safety supplied to the sufferer’s household and witnesses within the case.
The state authorities, which has already transferred the case to the CBI and has given consent to monitoring by the apex court docket, had filed the affidavit after the highest court docket sought particulars on witness safety and on whether or not the sufferer’s household has chosen a lawyer.
Referring to the compliance affidavit, Mehta mentioned that sufferer’s household has knowledgeable that they’ve engaged lawyer they usually have additionally requested that authorities advocate must also pursue the case on their behalf.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.